sie auch enden. Damit meine ich die aktuellen Einbrüche. Paul Volcker wird es nicht schaffen zum Glass-Steagal-Act zurück zu rudern.
BoA, JPM, Citi und Wells Fargo sind einfach aktuell nicht wegzudenken in ihrer aktuellen Form. Außerdem ist das Problem von der Politik hausgemacht, da sie von den Banken forderten Minderheiten Kredite zu gewähren. The bottom line is the Volcker plan does nothing to address this and is being used as a tool to keep our attention on the risk associated with investment banking and executive bonuses rather than the overall underlying causes of the mortgage fallout, which was in a big way consequences coming from forcing banks to make loans to those that in reality wouldn’t have otherwise been offered loans. In other words, it was a government-induced problem, and not solely banks engaging in risky behavior coming about from offering big bonuses to their people. That was a part of it, but a smaller part than is being asserted. The Volcker Plan really isn’t much more than a call to reinstate the Glass-Steagall Act, which some Senators have already suggested. But volcker goes further, throwing out the idea hedge funds and private equity would be under government oversight as well, and if they failed they would be allowed to, but just under the management the “resolution authority,” a new entity Obama wants to create for that purpose. As you get deeper into the proposed plan by Volcker, it becomes easily apparent there is no way this will become a reality. So to waste the time that is being spent on it as if it is a has a chance of passing and becoming law is ridiculous, to say the least. www.americanbankingnews.com/2010/02/03/...devastated-by-volcker-plan/ Mal abgesehen davon, wer bitte soll den Schattenbestand der Banken verwalten und bezahlen als die Banken selbst? In diesen sauren Apfel wird die Politik wohl beißen müssen oder die großen 4 mit GS 5 lassen die Börsen noch weiter abstürzen, bis Paul Volcker endlich geht. 
Gruß Marlboromann |