nicht in einem großen militärischen (nuklearen) Krieg, meint Brandon. Denn in einem Wirtschaftskrieg behält die Oligarchenelite die Oberhand und kann ihre Reichtümer in "safe havens" bewegen:
(selbe Quelle)
It seems to me that the natural progression of these tensions will end in economic retaliation [Vergeltung] from the East against the West, not nuclear retaliation.The thing is, this is actually a worse case scenario.
With nuclear conflagration comes immediate loss of full spectrum awareness for the elites. They lose their surveillance grid, they lose the means to maintain a healthy standing military, they lose the means to dictate the narrative because the mainstream media will not be functioning at that point, etc. During an economic crisis, they can shift wealth easily to safe havens, they can weaken certain militaries while strengthening others. They retain their control grid apparatus and use it effectively against the citizenry as long as there is not substantial civilian resistance, and the list goes on.
With nuclear war there would be total chaos. With economic crisis there is controlled chaos. The establishment prefers the latter course.... |
Thread abonnieren
