In diversen Fach Foren kursieren auch Bedenken gegen die neue Technologie. Klar will mam das nicht hören, aber nur noch die Euronen zählen halte ich für verfrüht. Da sind noch ein paar Hürden zu überwinden. Hier ein Geschmacksmuster, was in Pharma Fachkreisen so abgeht: Your vaccine uses a novel technology NEVER before applied in human vaccines- the RNA technology- this would be the FIRST ever vaccine using this technology applied to humans. Shouldn't this worry us, that you are using a completely new, un-tested technology? This technology is self-amplifying, so you are forcing the cell to replicate more copies of it. Why should we accept for granted such type of genetic engineering,? There are unique and unknown risks to messenger RNA vaccines, including the possibility that they generate strong type I interferon responses that could lead to inflammation and autoimmune conditions. We only know the body's reaction to this vaccine in weeks or the most in 2 months time after inoculation- how about the autoimmune conditions it may generate, or other side-effects it may lead to in years after the vaccine is applied? Maybe older population is not so much concerned about what may happen in a few years time, but we certainly and definitely should be concerned for our children and the rest of the adult population. What is BioNTech's position on LIBABILITY? Because we already know that Astra-Zeneca asked for a liability weaver... |