abgesehen von annubis nonsense-postings (shame over you ~ red card from me~ ich hätte dich schon längst aus arvia rausgeschmissen~ verstehe auch ariva nicht!!??) ) gab es diskussionen über datum/gerüchte bzgl. r/s und ferner beiträge über den transportindex und dass yrcw dort unterdurchschnittlich läuft (no names ~ die kommen und gehen die aasgeier). zur klarstellung hier zwei belegbare quellen: 1. datum r/s aus dem letzen filing If we are unable to meet the continued listing requirements of NASDAQ, our common stock currently listed on the NASDAQ may be delisted which would have an adverse effect on the market liquidity for our common stock. The NASDAQ’s continued listing requirements provide, among other requirements, that the minimum bid price of our common stock not fall below $1.00 per share for 30 consecutive business days. On March 3, 2010, we received from the NASDAQ a notice of non-compliance with the minimum bid price requirement and we have a grace period of 180 calendar days, or until August 30, 2010, to regain compliance with this requirement. In order to regain compliance, the closing price of our common stock must be $1.00 or greater for a minimum of ten consecutive business days during the 180-day grace period. On February 17, 2010, we received shareholder approval of an amendment to our certificate of incorporation that permits our board of directors to effect a reverse stock split within a range from 5:1 to 25:1 at anytime prior to February 17, 2011. 2. ein link über die performance der wettbewerber http://www.nasdaq.com/screening/...RCW&symbol=C&selected=YRCW demnach hat sich yrcw heute ganz gut geschlagen. das wird schon ötti |
Thread abonnieren
