Mein buisiness-english lässt ja wirklich zu wünschen übrig - das ist ja kein Geheimnis. Ich rette mich zwar ganz gut, habe aber in diesem Artiekeln so meine Schwierigkeiten. Vielleicht möchte mich jemand unterstützen:
Quelle: http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/commentary/...=105539&obspage=2
1 Frage aus diesem Absatz: Finally, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) was smacked with a downgrade to "hold" from "buy" at Argus. The negative note comes just a day after a judge threw out the company's pleas to dismiss a case regarding a former employee who claims he was forced to bribe Macau officials. The brokerage firm said similar cases have taken anywhere from one to three years to resolve, and the more high-profile suits have resulted in fines and legal bills of hundreds of millions of dollars.
Spricht die Richterin jetzt für oder gegen Sheldon ?
2 Frage aus diesem Absatz: From a sentiment perspective, there could be plenty more where that came from. According to Zacks, the stock boasts 15 "strong buys" and three "buy" endorsements, compared to six lukewarm "holds" and not a single "sell" recommendation. In similar fashion, Thomson Reuters deems the consensus 12-month price target at $53.88, representing a relatively steep premium of 42% to LVS' closing price of $37.94 yesterday.
Lese ich das richtig, dass im Grunde immer noch mehr Analysten LVS empfehlen ?
3 Frage aus diesem Absatz: Elsewhere on the Street, the options crowd also remains overly optimistic toward LVS. The stock's 10-day call/put volume ratio on the International Securities Exchange (ISE), Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE), and NASDA OMX PHLX (PHLX) sits at 3.12, just 10 percentage points from a bullish peak. Furthermore, the security's Schaeffer's put/call open interest ratio (SOIR) sits at an annual low of 0.44, implying that short-term speculators are more optimistically aligned toward LVS now than at any other time during the past year.
Mit Puts und Calls habe ich eh meine Schwierigkeiten
4 Frage aus diesem Absatz: On the charts, March has been rough for LVS thus far, with the stock shedding 17% since the start of the month. As a result, the security breached support in the $44 region, and is now testing support at its 200-day moving average. Should the equity surrender this foothold, too, or should LVS continue to struggle amid litigation woes, another wave of bearish brokerage attention, or an unwinding of optimism in the options pits, could exacerbate the stock's slide.
Ok, hier gehts wohl nur um die technische Analyse (GD200). Das verstehe ich wohl. Hier wird nur angesprochen, dass wegen diversen Sachen (Klage, Vertrauen, durchbrechen von Wiederstandszonen, GD200) noch weiter Druck auf die Aktien kommen könnte.
Also, vielen Dank für eine kurze Interpretation eurerseits ! ----------- Felix qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas - glücklich dem, der den Grund der Dinge erkennt ! |