Posted by: DonLeopoldo
In reply to: None Date:11/16/2006 7:47:24 PM
Post #of 290
Is PTSH the biggest NO BRAINER in history ?
PTSH : This stock is so unknown !!!
Do the math !!! this stock is still undiscovered. Nobody talks about it, and the only people that come to this board, just come to ask, but don\'t get the picture, either.
Only 1 or 2 posts per day, if any !!!
And in RB, only bashers, OT and advertising !!!
WOW, I am amazed !!! ... and feel so lucky to have read about PTSH when it was still trading at 0.0025 !!!
Do the math!!
I wonder what would happen if the dividend consisted in a 1x1 share of DBAC for each share of PTSH held?
DBAC\'s PPS, post-F/S ... 0.0200 $
It seems al lot, but it isn\'t, look:
DBAC O/S 1,810,000,000 , 1,300,000,000 belong to PTSH
PTSH O/S 145,000,000
[1,300,000,000 x 0.0200 ] / 145,000,000 = 0.1793 $
PTSH would not be undervalued, as per DBAC\'s PPS, if PTSH\'s O/S were higher than 2,321,500,000.
PTSH is x16 times undervalued right now, as per today\'s closin PPS of 0.0112 $
0,1793 / 0.0112 = 16
This is why I think DBAC is doing a 10x1 F/S; so that PTSH gets 1,300,000,000 shares in DBAC, and distributes 345,000,000 shares to PTSH holders, 1x1 shares of DBAC for each share held in PTSH.
PTSH would still control 955,000,000 shares in DBAC, versus 510,000,000 DBAC shares controled by the old PWVG owners.
And this dividend of 1x1 DBAC shares, that looks so terrific, it isn\'t so! ... because of the x16 undervalued of PTSH\'s PPS. Look:
If Dividend is 1x1, then each share in PTSH (worth 0.0112 $ as per today\'s closing PPS) would get 1 share of DBAC worth 0.0200 $, which is almost a +200% instant profit.
But if we consider that PTSH is x16 times undervalued, and it should be trading at 0.1793 $, then the 0.0200$ dividend (paid as DBAC shares) is only an 11 % profit.
With the adjusted PPS in DBAC, as per its stake in DBAC and today\'s closing PPS in DBAC, of 0.0200 $ (post F/S), and added the dividend, the PPS in DBAC would be worth:
0.1793 + 0.0200 = $0.1993
And this is why I\'m a shareholder in PTSH.
Plus, consider that DBAC is greatly going forward to profitability, as from the 10Q numbers and the new contracts that will be reflected in the next 10Q. I expect DBAC\'s PPS to go up, as it is coming out of a bottom, and the higher DBAC shares go, then much worth the PTSH shares will be.
If DBAC shares go back to the $ in 2007, if becoming profitable, then PTSH\'s PPS should be (as per its stake in DBAC):
1$/0.2=x5 bagger in DBAC if PPS goes to 1$ in 2007 due to profitability.
5 x 0.1793 = $ 0.8965
PTSH is the big unknown stock, and it is an instant x16 Bagger at this moment, and an x18 bagger if a 1x1 dividend is declared.
And if DBAC becomes profitable , and that is reflected in a DBAC PPS over 1$, then PTSH could become an x80 bagger. |
Thread abonnieren
