A negative influence of 33.8 billion yen don’t real exist
[Ono, Yomiuri Shimbun]: I have two questions. My first question is about the financial results. I understand that each segment is performing well, but looking at the earnings summary, I'm a bit concerned that the net loss has increased compared to the same period last year. I assume this is due to a one-off factor, but if there's any factor you can explain, please let me know. My second question is regarding Mobile's EBITDA being in the black if property taxes are excluded. I'm a bit hesitant about whether I can quote AI version of Mr. Mikitani's remarks as his own statements in a newspaper article. Could you please share your thoughts or confidence on this point again?
[Hirose, CFO]: Regarding the first point about the financial figures, while the operating loss has significantly narrowed and improved, financial income/expenses impacted pre-tax profit. As explained in the video, this is due to fluctuations in the hedging of perpetual subordinated bonds. Normally, if hedge accounting was applied, this would have no impact. However, under IFRS accounting, perpetual subordinated bonds are counted as capital, and their yen value is fixed at the historical rate at the time of issuance. Unrealized loss on this capital is not reflected in directly in the equity capital, but rather, it was booked as a hedging loss in the P&L. This is what significantly worsened, primarily in the pre-tax profit section. This fluctuation amounted to approximately 33.8 billion yen. On the other hand, regarding comprehensive income, the currency translation adjustment account fluctuated due to the impact of the stronger yen.
[Mikitani, CEO] So, it's a technical factor. Basically, it's related to finance, and I hope you understand that, Mr. Ono. As for my remarks on AI, I have thoroughly reviewed the script for them, so you can quote them as my statements.
25Q1transcript_E%2520(1).pdf |