Das passt vom Datum genau zum Anstieg. Ich verstehe das so, dass es für Cisco deutlich schwieriger wird, gegen Spherix vor Gericht zu gewinnen, Cisco ließ sich mit Rockstar auf Basis von Nortel-Patente irgend etwas regeln. Gerne kann das jemand genauer übersetzen.
cravi109 • Dec 4, 2014 10:40 AM
0 users liked this posts users disliked this posts 1 Reply
Spherix not part of Rockstar settlement with Cisco $188 million good or bad.
Rockstar is the major shareholder of Spherix and partnered in Spherix lawsuits ( legal ideas, technical ideas and both in active lawsuits with Cisco). Cisco has announced terms of settlement with Rockstar for $188 million Hayes has made a statement that Spherix is not part of this settlement. What does this all mean? The biggest tell in the highstakes poker game that Spherix is playing with the help of Rockstar ,is the overwhelming silence on the part of Spherix with regard to all other legal activities it is involved with. The counter lawsuit with Cisco against Spherix has been shut down as part of Rockstar's settlement. The Rockstar settlement with Cisco before any Marksman hearings validated value for Nortel patents. $188 million dollars is no small amount of money. All this points to a game of chicken between Spherix(Rockstar is the major share holder) and Cisco. Is the settlement with Rockstar a prelude to a much bigger settlement with Spherix? The fact that Cisco settled with Rockstar based on Nortel patents will make it all that much harder for Cisco to fight Spherix in court. What was the point of Spherix announcing that they weren't part of the Rockstar $188 million settlement? Less
Sentiment: Strong Buy |