habe den Artikel (an anderer Stelle) wiedergefunden. Es geht darum ob fremde DNA-Fragmente in den Impfstoffen ein Problem darstellen. Da gibts offenbar 2 Meinungen.. New HPV Vaccine on Horizon: Will it Also Contain DNA Fragments? "Preclinical data generated by researchers at The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, USA regarding AAVLP vaccine technology will be presented today at the World Vaccine Congress 2012 in Washington DC.Rochester, NY, April 11, 2012 — The Center for the Biology of Chronic Disease (CBCD) has recently learned that that preclinical data generated by researchers at The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, USA regarding AAVLP vaccine technology developed by the biotech company, MediGene AG, will be presented today at the World Vaccine Congress 2012 in Washington DC, US. The biotech’s information shows that mice vaccinated with an AAVLP vaccine carrying HPV L2 epitopes at two surface sites induces cross-neutralizing antibodies active against several HPV types, and supplies stable protection against vaginal HPV challenge over three months when using a clinically relevant mixture that elicits a strong immune response. The CBCD is watching the development of this new vaccine against HPV with great interest. Why? Because, the AAVLP vaccine technology is based on Adeno-associated virus-like particles which hold potential as prophylactic and therapeutic vaccines against cancer and infections according to MediGene AG. If these virus-like particles are anything like the virus-like particles used in the development of the FDA approved HPV vaccine, Gardasil then this new vaccine will also contain DNA fragments. The FDA has acknowledged that Gardasil contains viral DNA fragments. [1] According to the theory of Microcompetition, this could pose a problem. While the FDA says on their website: “The presence of DNA fragments is expected in Gardasil and not evidence of contamination.” and “Gardasil does contain recombinant HPV L1-specific DNA fragments, but these are not contaminants. DNA |