3.11. The damage to the preseizure shareholders was substantial. Wmi was allowed to isue 1,1 billion new common shares at the last shareholdermeeting in 2008. if the price of the shares had risen at the same pace as from 9.18. to 9.19, from 2,29 to 4,25, the price per share could have been at the 9.23.2008 above 6 dollars. Then wmi would have had the chance to sell their commons shares, and even if they would have got only 4,5 dollars per share, that would have been a 5 billion new capital for the wmi, and no seizure would have occured (citing fdic, if they had known, there was a cash deposit, they never would have seized wmb ??). And the shareholders would not have lost the company. And the damage to the post seizure shareholders happened likewise. I for example would have never invested so much money in wamuq and the other wmi securities, , if i had known the amount of the criminal efforts to harm wamu shareholders under the closed eyes of the government.. And the damage occured twice, first with the naked short selling, and then with the concealing of the facts by not reporting it to the SEC and not revealing it to the shareholders.
3.11. but there is another possibility for demages, the court ordered a trade restriction from the date of the filling for chapter 11. and the short covering, occuring at the 9/29/2008 and the 9/30/2008 must have violated the trade restriction for the ownershipchanges, and must have demaged the taxcarryforwards. The concealing of the criminal naked short covering from weil, gothsal and manges will destroy a lot of the estate valuable taxcarryforwards. And wgm did not make a discovery and a claim against the naked short rebuyers for destroying the taxcarryforwards.
3.12. because of the fraud of rosen and co, and wmi not reporting and not performing a investigation in the ´criminal, naked short selling with the jpm, the fdic, goldman sachs and the settlement noteholders as prime investigation targets, and the poswsible defraquding of the estate of the taxcarryforwards the por was not made in good faith, and should be denied.
Yours f.a.
I want to reserve all my rights, to sue the responsoble in theis criminal action, even if the court grants releases to them. In particular jpm, goldman sachs and the settlement noteholders fort he criminal naked shorts, and fort the cover up of this crime, and the cover up of the short selling covering the court, the managers of wmi, alvarez & marshal, and the counsels for wmi, weil, gotshal and manges, reichards, leyton and fingers. I will specifically not grant the court any right, to allocate any releases to jpm, goldman sachs, the board and the managment of wmi, and the counsels of wmi. ----------- "ein silber panda oder ein silber kookaburra kann die welt verbessern, grins" crasht jpm |