falls jemand was noch dazu sagen möchte gern .....bin auch nochmal bereit einen neuen Brief zu schreiben in anbetracht der neuen Situation zu first Berlin !!!!
ich finde wir sollten aufhören uns als shareholder alles gefallen zu lassen ....;(
open letter from the shareholders to paion. publishes ariva forum: https://www.ariva.de/forum/...ten-fakten-nachrichten-meinungen-543591
Chairman of the Management Board of PAION AG, Managing Director of PAION Deutschland GmbH
Dr. James (Jim) Phillips
Hello Dr. James Phillips,
My name is A.....H......, I am from H........, and I am a shareholder of Paion AG.
The story: I have been a shareholder of Paion AG for over 6 years now and am very concerned about the mood among the shareholders of the AG.
Many shareholders leave offensive comments, defame, and insult the work of the AG in well-known forums in the worst possible way.
Quote:
I don't see any connection between Penner and Paion. Penner has no idea, as has been said here often enough. Penner often says: "I don't know why this is like this, I don't think anything is going on in the background, because they don't know what they are doing"
“There are now claims that the management didn’t make any mistakes and that everything had been calculated and was correct. Evem claiming that the management was great and would have acted correctly in every market situation. Yes, to the detriment of the shareholders. People who have used sleight of hand by not fully releasing reports. You call that good management? Even the Bafin is active because of it. They do that because they handled it so well? They completely misjudged the market and wanted to chase after the fantasies of their head guru, instead of putting Remi on the market for short sedation (e.g. colonoscopy) years ago. Of course, applying for approval in advance. This could have been extended in the meantime. The highly-intelligent managers recognized this and did it 4 years later. That's supposed to be great management? YV, Anchor investor etc. etc. etc. There are many more situations where they made mistakes and then tried to hide these bad decisions by sending false or incomplete messages. However, they weren’t smart enough to know that these things always come out."
“Weak
The performance of the share is pitiful, there is no information from the "management team"
A new word for failure should be added to the dictionary.
“Unfortunately, desolate price drivers sit in the front row at Paion, who don't care about the price of the share as much as they do job security! About the IR in the name of Penner, with his overburdened work ethic, completely useless for the external presentation of Paion Not even rag papers would recommend to buy Paion, except for the mallets with a high risk rating, whatever they mean by that, but they are right in any case, the share price is right, you don't hear anything from or about Paion on the stock exchange, even though Remi is supposed to be so good
"Nevertheless, you can get half of their fat incomes with options, that creates confidence on the market and is fair to the shareholders. In the end, good work should be well paid and nothing else, but here Paion doesn’t have a single employee with corresponding shares in the enterprise itself, that is strange! I'm beginning to see that Remi is no longer in the spotlight, but rather the issue of paying all employees for as long as possible, even when performance is lacking. With Paion, after all the CIs, every employee would be a millionaire, even that loser Penner"
Dear Dr. Phillips, this is just a small sample of the more harmless statements on the Internet.
What bothers me is the lack of communication, e.g. periodic CEO letters to shareholders at certain times, information about the anaesthetics market (which doesn’t necessarily have to be very technical),
information about the licensees and their progress,
information about developments e.g. communication about advances in 3-monthly reports, explaining why YV was necessary and whether the first instalment of EIB loans has already been drawn down (this should have been done by 31/12/19!),
the publishing of interim development results!
This is communication!
There must be a discernible effort to ensure that the company shareholders
are kept informed!
A "relationship" must be built, and if Mr. Penner is reading this, he knows what questions the shareholders want answered.
Once trust has been built, it is also easier to say, "sorry, guys, I can't talk about that, it’s just a strategy”!
What isn’t a strategy is to write an email and then extract a response from the last quarterly report or add "call me" at the end!
I expect more than the obligatory financial reports, statutory or mandatory ad hoc reports, Voting Rights Announcements, or other rare DGAP news!
However, if there were a recognizable positive external strategy, the shareholders would be able to understand much better how Paion AG and its development around the anaesthetic Remimazolam is doing and, consequently, these negative and nasty comments would finally disappear from the Internet.
Can you promise me that in the future there will be a recognizable effort to improve communication and the sharing of information with shareholders like me?
In the hope that something changes, and a great story continues successfully, for both sides.
With kind regards from Hannover,
A....h....
|
Thread abonnieren
