Wenn der Marker 'Ökofaschismus' überhaupt Sinn macht, dann in der Verwandlung eines Teils der Erdbevölkerung in ein Überbevölkerungsproblem - so wie es der Malthusianer weiter oben vormacht. Diese ideelle Transformation zur Soylent Green Dystopie beschreibt die Schnittstelle zwischen den völkischen Klimaphoben und der heute gern vergessenen völkischen Herkunft* der Grünen, die erst spät ihre 'emanzipatorische' Ader entdeckt haben, die dann die Massenbasis ermöglicht hat. Dass die Paupers mit der falschen Hautfarbe, die eigentlich immer schon zuviele sind, nun auch noch für einen fatalen CO2 Fussabdruck verantwortlich sein sollen, ist dann auch das einzige, was die völkischen Kritiker der Grünen an der grünen Untergangserzählung gerne mitnehmen. Der grösste Witz ist es also, wenn gerade die vom 'Ökofaschismus' sprechen.
* Rechtsextreme Ideologien im Natur- und Umweltschutz
Eine realistische Auskunft zum globalen Bevölkerungswachstum findet man oben in dem Video von der Murmel. Die Verteilungsfrage wird dabei allerdings nicht angesprochen. Das hatte ja auch bereits schon Marx in seiner Replik auf Malthus gemacht:
...another dispute concerns the notion of "overpopulation".[18] In Marx's own time, Thomas Robert Malthus raised dire predictions that population growth enabled by capitalist wealth would exceed the food supply required to sustain that population. As noted, for Marx "overpopulation" was really more an ideologically loaded term or social construct and Marxists have argued there is no real problem here as enough food can be produced for all; if there is a problem, it lies in the way that food is produced and distributed.
Marx argued that there are no substantive laws of population that hold good for all time; instead, each specific mode of production has its own specific demographic laws. If there was "overpopulation" in capitalist society, it was overpopulation relative to the requirements of capital accumulation. Consequently, demography could not simply just count people in various ways as it also had to study the social relations between them as well. If there are enough resources on the planet to provide all people with a decent life, the argument that there are "too many people" is rather dubious.
People cannot help being born and being there, but the concept of overpopulation can easily suggest that part of the people do not really deserve to be there, or that they should not exist. From there, it is only another step to hating part of the human race and to feel justified in wiping that part out (or at least subject people to compulsory sterilization). If people believe that each human being has a right to be there and enjoy life, there cannot be "overpopulation". At most, one could say that there are too many people living in a particular area. Even so, people can get used to living with remarkably little personal space.... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reserve_army_of_labour
----------- it's the culture, stupid |