14.04.2010 22:47
CME loses bid to SHIELD Goldman, others in Lehman case
By Emily Chasan and Ann Saphir
"NEW YORK/CHICAGO, April 14 [2010] (Reuters) - CME Group Inc lost a bid to withhold the identity of firms that took part in an emergency auction of the futures and options positions of a floundering Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc in 2008.
CME asked Barclays Bank, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan Chase, and Chicago-based trading firms Citadel LP and DRW Trading to take part in the auction, according to unredacted court documents. Of those firms, all but Morgan Stanley took part.
The ruling, on Wednesday, sparked worries in the futures industry about how to resolve future crises. CME, joined by several industry groups, had argued that revealing the names of the participants could hurt its ability to hold future auctions, because traders don't want their competitors to know what assets they hold or how much they paid for them.
'I'm not sure what divulging the identity of the bidders adds,' said Dan Roth, president of the National Futures Association, after Judge James Peck, who is overseeing the Lehman bankruptcy in Manhattan, rejected a request from CME Group to keep certain documents about the auction secret. 'It may have a chilling effect on people's willingness to participate in these auctions in the future.'
CME conducted the September 2008 auction of Lehman's $2 billion portfolio after it became clear the firm would seek bankruptcy protection.
Bidders were given a look at the assets and a deadline by which to place their bids under seal.
If traders knew those bids would be revealed, they might have submitted lower bids, or even declined to participate at all, industry observers said. That could complicate matters if another large firm fails and its assets need to be liquidated so as to insulate other members of a clearinghouse from the failure.
'This was the first time the CME had to conduct an auction of this kind,' CME Associate General Counsel Lisa Dunsky told the court before the ruling. 'We hope that it doesn't happen again, but if it does, whether it's CME or any other clearing house, it is critical to have multiple qualified bidders who are willing to participate in the auction.'
Dunsky said that more than one of the bidders whose names were going to be disclosed had told CME directly that they would not have participated in the auction if they had known their trades would be made public.
'There is potential significant harm not only to CME Group but to the futures markets in general,' Dunsky said.
But Judge Peck on Wednesday disagreed and ordered the immediate publication of the full examiners' report. He said the 'public's right to know' outweighed confidentiality concerns and that no one knows whether a similar auction would actually occur in the future.
Attorneys for the examiner, Anton Valukas, who is chairman of Chicago-based law firm Jenner&Block, said that it is 18 months after the fact, and that potential litigation could be brought over some of these trades and people would need to know whom to sue.
Each winning bidder that took over a piece of the Lehman portfolio did so at a gain, the documents showed. The examiner concluded that although an argument could be made that the transfers at issue were fraudulent in part because Lehman may have received less than fair payments for its assets, 'the evidence does not support the existence of colorable claims.'
A representative for Lehman's TRUSTEE in charge of liquidating customer assets said in COURT on Wednesday that the trustee may SUE to recover some of these transactions"...
http://www.finanznachrichten.de/...dman-others-in-lehman-case-020.htm -----------
Vorhang AUF, der Krimi geht weiter... |
Thread abonnieren
